Federal Appeals Court Rejects Regulator’s Attempt to Block Election Betting Contracts

A federal‍ appeals court has rejected an attempt ⁣by U.S. financial regulators to ‌block derivatives trading platform Kalshi from offering contracts that let people make speculative bets‍ on the outcome ‍of U.S. ‍elections.

The U.S. Court⁣ of Appeals for the District of ‍Columbia Circuit on Oct. 2⁢ denied an emergency ​motion for a stay pending appeal filed by the⁤ Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The ‍CFTC had sought to halt a district⁣ court’s decision that allowed Kalshi to offer financial market instruments enabling Americans to legally bet on elections in a regulated marketplace.

Circuit Judge Patricia Millett, writing for the‍ three-judge panel, said the CFTC had not demonstrated sufficient evidence that the contracts would cause‍ irreparable harm to the ⁢public or undermine the integrity of​ U.S. elections while ⁤the‍ CFTC’s appeal⁢ is heard.

“Because the Commission‍ has failed at this time to demonstrate that it or the public will be irreparably injured⁣ absent a stay, ‌we deny its motion‍ without prejudice to renewal should more concrete evidence of irreparable harm develop during the ‌pendency of this appeal,” Millett wrote ‌in ⁤the opinion.

Kalshi’s “Congressional Control Contracts” allow ⁢investors to bet on ​which political party will win control of the U.S.‌ House of Representatives or Senate in federal elections. The​ CFTC argued that such ⁢contracts amount to illegal gambling‌ or gaming and are prohibited‌ under state⁤ laws.

The court⁣ found that the regulatory agency ⁢failed to⁣ substantiate⁤ claims that these contracts would ⁢lead to market manipulation ⁢or distort election outcomes.

During a Sept. 19 hearing, both sides presented arguments before a three-judge⁢ appellate panel​ regarding Kalshi’s ⁤”Congressional Race ⁤Contracts.”⁢ CFTC General Counsel Rob Schwartz expressed concerns ⁣about potential manipulation ‌and public mistrust if ⁤individuals were allowed to wager large sums on election outcomes, while Kalshi’s attorney Yaakov Roth argued against these ⁢claims and stated there⁤ was no evidence of irreparable harm.

The ruling now allows Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour’s platform to ‍offer election-related contracts pending further legal proceedings.

Share:

Leave the first comment

Related News