Critics Express Concern as Misinformation Bill Returns to Parliament with Expanded Definition of ‘Harm

The ⁣Labor government has reintroduced the⁣ Misinformation and Disinformation‍ Bill to Parliament⁢ after it was delayed in late 2023. The proposed⁤ law aims to empower the Australian Communications and ‌Media Authority (ACMA) to address “misinformation and disinformation” on ‍social media platforms such as X, facebook, Instagram, and TikTok. Corporations ⁤found in violation of‌ the rules could face fines of up to 5 percent of their global revenue or $8.25‍ million (US$5.5 million).

The Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) ⁢Bill 2024 was presented to the House of Representatives on Sept. 12 but is currently adjourned for debate until ‌the next sitting‌ of Parliament.

Labor Communications Minister Michelle Rowland ⁢stated ‍that the Bill’s purpose is to “keep Australians safe online” by holding ⁤digital platforms accountable through ACMA’s ‍authority. She emphasized that misinformation and disinformation pose ​significant threats not only to individuals’ safety but also to democracy, society, and the economy.

Rowland mentioned that⁢ revisions were⁢ made⁢ based on public consultation⁤ in ​order to strike a balance between combating misinformation in⁣ the public interest while preserving ‍freedom of expression.

Critics have expressed concerns about the scope of misinformation being broadened by this⁣ legislation. United ⁣Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet described it as a “dystopian attack on free speech,” urging opposition from all political ⁢spectrums.

The Institute of ⁣Public Affairs criticized the bill as a “chilling assault on every Australian’s right to free speech.”‌ Director of Law and Policy John Storey argued⁢ that even factual information lacking context⁢ could fall within its scope⁢ due ⁢to ‍broad provisions censoring speech.

The Bill ⁣defines misinformation or disinformation as content reasonably verifiable as false, misleading, or deceptive when published online for ⁤Australian users.⁢ It⁢ must also be likely to cause or contribute serious harm or be distributed by a foreign ⁣power.

Serious harm includes ⁤potential damage⁤ not only related to electoral processes but also public health, vilification based on various characteristics such ‍as race⁤ or religion, imminent‌ damage to critical infrastructure, and emergency⁢ services.

Exceptions under this legislation include parody/satire content, professional news content, academic/artistic/scientific/religious purposes content. Social media​ companies ⁤will be required by ACMA rules to provide ​information ⁤regarding their handling of misinformation/disinformation.

ACMA can approve an industry‌ code of conduct ⁣or introduce standards if self-regulation⁤ falls short; however, it cannot directly ⁢remove offensive accounts/content from platforms which remain responsible for managing their own terms of service.

Corporations failing compliance⁢ may face fines ranging from 5k-25k penalty units while individuals may face fines ranging from 1k-5k⁣ penalty units according to⁤ increased values set by the federal government in July 2024 ($330 ⁢per unit).

The federal opposition has previously ‌expressed concerns about this legislation but ⁣will take‍ time considering its current ⁣form according to Shadow Communications Minister David⁤ Coleman who emphasized freedom of ⁤speech’s importance in democracy.

Share:

Leave the first comment

Related News