The European Commission has proposed a one-year delay in implementing a law that would ban the import of commodities linked to deforestation. The EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR), set to take effect on December 30, requires companies importing products such as soy, beef, cocoa, coffee, palm oil, timber, and rubber to prove that their supply chains did not contribute to deforestation or face fines. While the EU sees this legislation as crucial for its climate-action agenda and addressing biodiversity loss, critics argue that it will disrupt supply chains and may harm biodiversity.
In response to global partners’ calls for more time, the European Commission has proposed an additional 12 months of phasing-in time. However, approval from both the European Parliament and member states is required for this extension. Under the law’s provisions, companies must submit due diligence statements electronically to the deforestation registry created by the European Commission for verification.
Companies are concerned about having to digitally map their supply chains down to specific plots where raw materials grow using satellite technology. Members of the European Parliament Herbert Dorfmann and Peter Liese have expressed concerns about what they call a “bureaucratic monster” that threatens animal feed supplies and trade in consumer goods.
Several EU member states have urged Brussels to scale back or suspend the law due to potential harm it could cause their own farmers who export products grown on deforested land. Brazil, Australia, and the United States have also requested a delay. Additionally, various industry associations across Europe have voiced concerns about facing “paralyzing uncertainties.”
While aiming to prevent biodiversity loss with this legislation, some ecologists argue that it could negatively impact ancient ecosystems. They believe simplistic policies fail to differentiate between different types of ecosystems and may do more harm than good.
Environmentalists warn against overlooking nuanced aspects of natural forests when implementing such laws as they can inadvertently lead to negative consequences for biodiversity. The potential dangers include irreversible damage if systems deeply rooted in knowledge of ecosystems are disrupted.
The Epoch Times reached out for comment from the EU Commission but did not receive a response at publication time.