Calls to Remove Trump from Ballot in California Rejected by Secretary of State

California’s Secretary of State Shirley Weber has made a bold move by keeping former President Donald Trump on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, despite several states choosing to remove his candidacy. The decision was officially certified on December 28, with the presidential primary election set to take place on March 5, 2024.

This move by Weber comes just hours after Maine’s Secretary of State Shenna Bellows declared that President Trump cannot appear on the primary ballot in the state. Bellows cited the “insurrection clause” of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution as the reason behind her decision.

The decision to keep Trump on the ballot in California is likely to spark controversy and debate, as it goes against the trend of several other states that have moved to exclude the former president from their primaries. The move also comes at a time when Trump’s political future remains uncertain, with speculation rife about whether he will run for president again in 2024.

Trump’s exclusion from the primary ballot in some states stems from his actions in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, particularly his efforts to overturn the results and his role in the January 6th Capitol riot. These actions have led some state officials to argue that Trump’s candidacy would violate the “insurrection clause” of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits individuals from holding public office if they have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States.

The decision to keep Trump on the ballot in California could have significant implications for the state’s primary election. Trump remains a highly polarizing figure, with a dedicated base of supporters as well as a substantial number of detractors. His presence on the ballot is likely to impact voter turnout and could have broader implications for the state’s political landscape.

Weber’s decision has drawn attention from both Democrats and Republicans, with some praising her for upholding the principles of democracy and allowing voters to make their own choices, while others have criticized her for giving Trump a platform to continue to spread what they see as divisive and dangerous rhetoric.

The decision also highlights the complex interplay between federal and state election laws, and the broad discretion that state officials have in determining who can appear on the ballot. While the Constitution establishes the framework for federal elections, states are largely responsible for overseeing their own election processes and determining the rules for candidate eligibility.

The controversy surrounding Trump’s candidacy in the 2024 presidential election is likely to continue to generate debate and discussion in the coming months. As the primary election approaches, all eyes will be on California to see how this decision ultimately plays out and whether it will have broader implications for the Republican Party and the political landscape as a whole.


Hot News