Democrats Demand Jail Time for Using Gas-Powered Lawn Mowers

Democrats in the state of Washington have proposed a plan to criminalize the use of gasoline-powered lawn mowers, with offenders facing potential jail time. According to a report by Slay News, state Reps. Amy Walen and Liz Berry introduced House Bill 1868, which seeks to eliminate emissions from outdoor power equipment and transition consumers to electric machines.

The lawmakers argue that gas-powered gardening tools contribute to air pollution and public health concerns. They cite data from Joe Biden’s Environmental Protection Agency, which attributes 5% of the nation’s air pollution to lawn machines and estimates that 17 million gallons of gasoline are spilled each year while refueling them. Additionally, they claim that running a gas lawnmower for one hour can produce as much smog-forming pollution as driving a passenger car 300 miles.

The proposed legislation covers a wide range of tools, including lawnmowers, strimmers, hedge trimmers, chainsaws, leaf blowers, augers, wood chippers, pressure washers, snowblowers, and more. Violators would face potential jail time of up to 364 days or a fine of up to $10,000, or both.

However, critics of the plan argue that it disproportionately impacts minority-owned businesses, particularly in the landscaping industry. A report from ZeroHedge highlighted concerns that the transition to zero-emission alternatives would be financially burdensome for many business owners, potentially leading to a reduction in diversity within the industry.

Additionally, opponents of the plan argue that current limitations of electric landscaping equipment, such as battery life and power, may not meet the demands of larger or more intensive landscaping projects. They question whether tax credits and financial assistance provided in the bill would be sufficient to cover the constant need to upgrade to better and more efficient technology.

The proposal has sparked debate over its potential impact on businesses, public health, and environmental concerns. Critics argue that the plan is anti-business and raises questions about the practicality and affordability of transitioning to electric equipment.

While the lawmakers behind the plan assert that it is necessary to combat climate change and reduce air pollution, opponents are raising concerns about the feasibility and potential consequences of such a drastic measure. As the debate continues, the future of gas-powered gardening tools and the potential criminalization of their use remains a contentious issue in Washington state.


Related News