The Australian postal agency, which has been operating at a financial loss, has decided to suspend mail services to and from Israel, citing safety concerns. This move has raised eyebrows, especially since the agency continues to operate in Ukraine, another conflict zone. Australian journalist Andrew Bolt highlighted the hypocrisy of this decision, pointing out that private couriers like Pack and Send and DHL are not facing any issues delivering mail to and from Israel.
According to a report by the RAIR Foundation, Australia Post is experiencing a $200 million loss and a significant decline in letter delivery volumes. This financial struggle has led to a shift in domestic mail delivery schedules. The decision to suspend mail services to Israel has sparked criticism and debate, with National Sen. Matt Canavan expressing his disapproval and urging the company to explore growth opportunities and diversify its services.
The announcement has also raised questions about Australia Post’s strategic direction and its role in international relations. Many are questioning the agency’s alignment with the anti-Semitic Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to undermine the Israeli economy through boycott efforts. The decision to suspend mail services to Israel has been viewed as a moral and operational failure by critics, and its broader implications on Australia’s social and political discourse continue to be debated.
Andrew Bolt uncovered the change in Australia Post’s mail services after a Jewish teacher at a Jewish school informed him that the postal agency had refused to deliver letters written by her students in support of Israel. Bolt emphasized the moral implications of cutting off mail services to Israel, stating that it is a decision with significant moral consequences.
This decision has stirred controversy and criticism, especially given the agency’s continued operations in Ukraine. Many are questioning the motives behind Australia Post’s selective enforcement and its impact on international relations. The agency’s decision to suspend mail services to and from Israel has brought attention to the larger issue of international postal services and their role in geopolitics.
In light of these developments, it is clear that Australia Post’s decision has sparked widespread debate and criticism. The agency’s alignment with the BDS movement and its impact on Australia’s social and political discourse continue to be hotly debated. As the situation evolves, the implications of this decision will undoubtedly continue to be scrutinized.
In conclusion, Australia Post’s suspension of mail services to Israel has ignited a firestorm of controversy and criticism. The decision has raised questions about the agency’s financial struggles, strategic direction, and its role in international relations. As the situation continues to unfold, the moral and political implications of this decision will undoubtedly be at the forefront of public discourse.
This article originally appeared on WND.com
Guest by post by Bob Unruh
Copyright 2023 WND News Center
